Random Ish.

I have had a pretty busy and stressful week this week. So busy in fact, that I have spent most of this weekend trying to recover from it.  It’s only a few moments ago that I realised “oh crap I haven’t done a blog for this week yet!”, so I suddenly got myself on here.

Thing is, it’s one of those times when I start a blog with no idea of what I’m going to write about. There are some things I could mention, like that bloody Friday song that has taken over the internet this week, but I think there’s been a lot said about that already. I did do my bit for the cause by accidentally donating £30 through three separate text messages as I didn’t receive any thank you texts for the first two thus thought they didn’t get them.  I’m not too bothered about that though. I could also talk about Comic Relief, but again, a lot has been said about that. I could say that I have finally got my proper broadband back after what seems like ages using a dongle, but that would be a bit of a boring post. And I would rather not use this space to whinge about work, however I would just like to say that I would not like to have a job in management after the week I have had.

So this entry is more about keeping the “post a week challenge” going. Bit shit really, isn’t it?

Advertisements

Twitrelief

Today saw the launch of twitrelief, an online charity auction in which people can bid for a twitter follow from their favourite celebrities, with proceeds going to Comic Relief. It’s launch caused a bit of a fuss on twitter, to put it mildly. As expected, the more cynical sector of the twitterati were up in arms about it, with views ranging from the “self-important celebs making us massage their ego in the name of charity” variety to the “it’s not just in the spirit of twitter” variety.

Personally, I don’t see twitrelief as being different to any other charity auction where items donated by celebrities are offered to the highest bidder.  And if you read further into this, you’ll there’s more than just a follow being given away in a lot of cases  . For example, the highest bidder for Miranda Hart gets a signed Miranda script as well, while the winner of Richard Curtis’ auction also gets a walk on part in his next film. Any attempt to raise loads of money for what is no doubt a worthy cause is a good thing in my opinion.

There is another reason why I like this idea. One of my pet hates on twitter is the way that some users pester certain celebrities in order to get noticed by them. Go on twitter at any time of day and you’ll see people – teenagers in particular – spamming the timelines of their idols (and those of others) with tweets along the lines of  “OMG  PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE CAN YOU FOLLOW ME/TWEET ME I LOVE YOU SO MUCH!!!!”, only to get pissed off when they don’t get what they want. Now, if I was a famous person, I’d see that as more of a reason NOT to follow someone than to follow them. More to that though, I believe that if you’re going to be followed by anyone or get a reply from them, especially  someone of note, then you should earn it.  Thus if an individual can muster up a load of money for charity in order to have the privilege of a follow from their hero, then in this case, they have earned it. If twitrelief can make all the kids begging celebs to follow them shut up for a bit, then I’m all for it. More importantly, if it can make them dig into their pockets, if not to make a bid then to donate straight to Comic Relief, then it can only be a good thing.

On another note, reading all the negative comments about twitrelief made me wonder whether the people making them would object if I, a non-famous twitterer, were to tell all prospective  followers that I would only follow them back if they promised to donate at least £5 to Comic Relief. I’ve no doubt they probably would, but sod them.